「利用者を大切にすべきだ。」という論理への反論は「利用者を大切にすべき

「利用者を大切にすべきだ。」という論理への反論は「利用者を大切にすべきではない。」であって、「社員も大切にされるべきだ。」ではありません。別の論議を持ち出すと、話の論点が不明瞭になります。

Results (English) 1:

"Users ought to cherish. "That is a rebuttal to a logical ' users should be important is not. "Even if the ' employees also should be important. "Is not. Another discussion to bring up to obscure the conversation.

Results (English) 2:

"I should cherish the user." Rebuttal to the logic that is a "should not be to cherish the user.", Not "employees should be valued.". When bring up another controversy, issue of the story becomes obscured.

Results (English) 3:

"We should treasure the user." To argue that logic should not important. " The "should be an important partner." Is not. Introduce another controversial issues, the story goes.