雄吾様 スワットさんからのHakueisya（ＨＣＴ）のメールですが、

雄吾様

スワットさんからのHakueisya（ＨＣＴ）のメールですが、以下の解釈で間違い無いでしょうか？

１． ＨＣＴからＣＧＴへの請求（材料購入）に対する支払い ＝ Total 370,898,11バーツ
２． ＣＧＴからＨＣＴに請求（部品納入）した金額 ＝ Total 500,119.07バーツ

しかし、ＨＣＴは１２月末に129,205.96バーツしか支払って来ず、残りの370,898.11バーツを
１／２０に支払ってくる。

この解釈でよければ、スワットさんに問題ないと回答してあげたいです。
お手数ですが、下記文面の確認をお願いします。

下脇

Results (English) 1:

Mr. y. s. From SWAT, Hakueisya (HCT) mail is no mistake in the interpretation of the following?1. From the HCT to pay invoices to the CGT (material purchase) = Total 370,898, 11 baht2. From the CGT to HCT request （ measuredinternally ） amount = Total 500, 119.07 bahtHowever, the HCT, did not pay only 129,205.96 baht by the end of December to the rest of 370,898.11 baht1 ／ 20 will pay.Give not to swat's problems, in this interpretation and response.Sorry, but please check the following wording.Effortlessly

Results (English) 2:

Yugo-like but is the email of Hakueisya (HCT) from the Swat-san, I will no doubt by the following interpretation? 1. The payment for the claim (material purchase) from the HCT to CGT = Total 370,898,11 baht 2. Claim to HCT from CGT (parts delivery) Amount = Total 500,119.07 baht However, HCT is not coming only paid 129,205.96 baht at the end of December, the rest of 370,898.11 baht come paid to 1/20. If you are satisfied with this interpretation, I want to give the respondents with no problem in Swat's. sorry to trouble you, but, please check the following wording. Under side

Results (English) 3:

Yugo SWAT as well from Hakueisya (HCT mail), in the following explanation is correct? Made from HCT to request payment CGT (purchase) Total = 370, 898, for 2 to 11 from CGT HCT (parts supplier, sum = 500) Total with 119.07 baht but in the end of December HCT 129, without paying only 205.96 baht the rest of the, 898.11 370 to come to pay 20. 1. If you like this, tooAnd I want to reply and no problem in Swat. At the moment, please check the following letter. Shimowaki too too