/12に平出工場長が持参したサンプルと、試験データは、(0.18±0.

/12に平出工場長が持参したサンプルと、試験データは、(0.18±0.008）が規格値(評価基準）で、
0.172の下限値が含まれています。・・・・バラツキで下限値以下が含まれると判断(上記疑問）

２、6/30の添付データは、評価基準が0.178±0.004（0.174～0.182）となり、合格となっています。
これは、当初の基準よりも厳しい規格(基準)として評価されていますが、この基準が正しいのであればOKです。
しかし、1の提示データ、その後、6/19の提示データー、今回のデーターがあり、それぞれが整合取れていません。

⇒、結果的にデータが変わった理由が不明、そのために最終的にＯＫでも不信感が大きくなっています。

これらの内容の確認と、最終的に管理する基準を明確にしてください。

このままだと、話がまとまらない方向に行ってしまうように思います。

Results (English) 1:

/ Hiraide plant manager brought in 12 samples and test data (0.18 ± 0.008) with standard values (criterion) Contains a minimum of 0.172. Judged... variation in below the lower limit (above question)Attachment 2, 6 / 30, evaluation criteria 0.178 ± 0.004(0.174~0.182) next door, has been passed. It is OK if it is rated as the original standards are tougher than standard (standards), but this standard is correct in. But one holdout, then 6 / 19 present data, this data, each out of alignment. ⇒, resulting in changed data is unknown, therefore eventually OK though distrust is growing.By reviewing these and finally managed to see clearly.Direction settled and the story seems gone.

Results (English) 2:

/ And samples Hiraide factory length is to bring to 12, the test data, (0.18 ± 0.008) is at the standard value (evaluation criteria),
it contains a lower limit of 0.172. ... Determined that the variations include the following lower limit value (the question) attached data of 2,6 / 30, the evaluation criteria are 0.178 ± 0.004 (0.174 ~ 0.182) next, has become a pass. This is has been rated as a strict standard (reference) than the original standard, it is OK as long as this standard is correct. However, one of the presented data, then, 6/19 presented data of, there is this time of the data, not each is 0. integrity. ⇒, resulting in why the data has changed is unknown, has finally OK even greater distrust for that. And confirmation of these contents, please clarify the final management criteria. When I leave this, I think that as gone in the direction in which the story is not settled.

Results (English) 3:

Sample carried by a length 12 hiraide factory, test data, 0.18 ± 0.008) standard value evaluation criteria), which includes the lower limit value of the 0.172. And the variation is less than the lower limit value judgment of the above questions, RI 30 attached data, the evaluation criteria 0.178 ± 0.004 (0.174 to 0.182), and the result is acceptable. At the beginning of the stringent standards than the reference standard is regarded as a reference if OK is correct. However, at present, one of the dataThereafter, 6 / 19 / presentation data, this data is not matched with each other. On ⇒、 result data has changed. The reason is unknown, and ultimately in the OK distrust is getting bigger. Confirmation of these contents, and finally to a reference to management. As it is, too, so as not to go. Too