さて、ご相談しておりました表面処理メッキ⇒カチオン への変更の件ですが

さて、ご相談しておりました表面処理
メッキ⇒カチオン
への変更の件ですが、弊社客先より評価部品の
指示において貴社で生産予定のAR3では無く、
現在中国にて生産している他社製の部品を手配
する様指示が有りました。

理由は、「現行量産品」での比較をしたいとの事です。
（但し、弊社としては現行量産中の中国製の部品は
そのままメッキ継続として、貴社で今後生産される
AR3からカチオン化に変更して貰う事で進める予定）

ついては、大変恐縮ですが中国他社で生産している
製品を貴社に発送しますので、貴社の塗装ラインで
カチオン処理をお願いしたいと思います。

数量は全部で16台です。
◇内訳
①貴社標準塗膜管理品（15μ±5μ） 6台
②貴社標準塗膜管理下限値品（10μ～12μ以下）10台

尚、こちらから発送する16台は既にメッキとカチオン塗装が
されておりますので、（カチオンは試作品）貴社で一旦”剥離”
処理をされてから既述塗膜狙い値で貴社でのカチオン塗装を
お願いしたいと思います。

尚、処理費用のお見積りは前後になりますがATT宛に
発行をお願いします。
カチオン処理後の納入はATT宛でお願いします。

後で確認のお電話を差し上げます。

以上ご面倒お掛けしますが宜しくお願い申し上げます。

Results (English) 1:

But I was now, consult surface treatmentPlated ⇒ cation To the change is a matter of, our customers want more evaluation componentsInstructions in your AR3 production plan is not Arrange third-party components are currently produced in ChinaThere was-like instructions. Why want to compare with current production and the thing is. （ However, as our current Chinese-made parts in mass production Intact produced a future as a plated continue in your companyGo ahead with things from AR3 get changed to cationic ）Is very sorry about the production in ChinaWill be shipped to your company as your paint line Would like to ask the cation process. Quantity is 16 units in total.-Breakdown (1) your standard coating film management products （ 15 µm ± 5 μm ） 6 units (2) your standard coating film management lower value products (10 µm to 12 microns) 10 units 16 units, shipped from here is already plated and cationic coating Is because we are (cation for prototype) in your company once "peeling"In the aforementioned coating films aimed at value is processed from cationic coating in your company Would you want to ask. Processing cost estimate will be around, but to ATTThank you to publish.Cation process after delivery please with ATT. Later we will call us for confirmation. More trouble you may ask.

Results (English) 2:

Well, it had been consultation surface treatment
plating ⇒ cation
Although it is matter of changes to, than evaluation parts our customer
in AR3 of the production plan in your company in the instructions without,
third-party that has been produced in current China to arrange the parts of
instructions like that was there. The reason is that it is a desire to the comparison of the "current mass-produced products". (However, Chinese-made parts in the current mass production as our company as it is as plating continues, is produced future in your plans proceed in that you get by changing the cationized from AR3) For, very regret at the Chinese companies production And then have to ship the product to your company because, in your paint line you would like to ask the cation processing. Quantity is 16 units in total. ◇ breakdown ① your standard coating film management product (15μ ± 5μ) 6 units ② your standard coating film management lower value goods (10μ ~ 12μ or less) 10 units In addition, 16 units to be shipped from here is already plated and cation paint is Since cage you, (cation prototype) Once "peeling" in your company the cation paint in your in Sundejutsunurimaku aim value from being a treatment you would like to ask. In addition, our estimate of the processing cost will be around but addressed to ATT please the issue. Delivery after cation process will please addressed to ATT. Later I'll give a confirmation of your phone. You multiply your trouble you more, but thank you.

Results (English) 3:

Well, and you did it to the plating surface treatment of cationic modification of instruction, assessment of the parts by our customers in your company in the AR production schedule, there was no indication that China is currently in production of to at the parts arrangement. The reason is that the current "mass-produced" to make a comparison. Our company (as the current mass production parts made in China as it is, and the future of your company in the plating continuously produced.From 3 to AR cation modified as scheduled in advance to RI, I am sorry to trouble in Chinese companies are producing products shipped to you because of your painting line to the processing of cations. The whole table 16 is too. I
◇ standard film breakdown at managing your product (5. Mu ± 15. 6) at the lower limit value management from your standard coating products (less than 10 to 12) 10 too, from here to dispatch table 16 that cationic coating and plating, and so(cation) you think the film from the above value aim to please cation at the painting in your ”
peeling process once ". Well, the processing cost estimate is back and forth to ATT at issue, please. After processing at the cation ATT supplier, please. After you make the call. As well as trouble you, but please. Stress