１．線径については、最初のサンプルから全数の測定データが付いていました

１．線径については、最初のサンプルから全数の測定データが付いていました。（10本
だけではない）サンプルに付いてきたデータは、何のデータなのでしょう？
２．線径の許容範囲は、現在頂いている仕様書に記載されている線径はφ0.18±0.008です。
Before φ0.178±0.004は、何の規格でしょうか？
３．弊社としては仕様書の規格が厳しくなるのは良いことですが、それによってコストUp
することはNGです。弊社としては、線径が100％ φ0.18±0.008を保証してもらえれば
OKです。その保証をするために、メーカー社内の検査規格を厳しくすることがメーカーで
必要と判断したのであれば弊社は、意見を言う立場にありません。
４．線径の規格を変更する理由も教えてください

Results (English) 1:

1. For wire diameter, with measurement data of the census from the first sample. (10 books Just not) sample came with data is the data of what would be?2. Wire diameter tolerance is the wire diameter specification has now been listed diameter 0.18 ± 0.008 is. Before diameter 0.178 ± 0.004 do what standards?3. As our stringent specification standards of good thing is it costs up That is NG. As our wire diameter is 100% diameter 0.18 ± 0.008 would ensure It is OK. Manufacturer is to guarantee that manufacturers in-house testing standards to tighten If deemed necessary in our opinion we cannot say.4. Please tell me no reason to change the wire gauge standards

Results (English) 2:

1. For wire diameter, it was from the first sample have a total number of measurement data. and (10 This
is not the only) data that has been attached to the samples, Will of what data?
2. Acceptable range of wire diameter, wire diameter, which are described in the specification that is currently received is φ0.18 ± 0.008.
Before φ0.178 ± 0.004 is, what standards?
3. It is a good thing the standard specification is strict as our company, but by the cost Up
It is NG to. As our company, wire diameter is, if I guarantee 100% φ0.18 ± 0.008
is OK. To make that guarantee, be strictly a manufacturer-house inspection standard manufacturer
our company as long as was deemed necessary is not in a position to say the opinion.
4. Please tell us reason to change the standard of wire diameter

Results (English) 3:

The diameter of the sample from the first with a total number of measured data. Not only the (10) data as sample data, isn't it? 2 the permissible range of the diameter, is now described in the specification is 0.18 ± 0.008 diameter. Phi. At the Before. Phi.. 0.178 0.004, what standards? It is our 3 as the specification standards of good NG strictly, it will make the cost Up. Our company and the100% 0.18 diameter. Phi.. I 0.008 guarantee at the OK. In order to guarantee the strict inspection standards of manufacturers in the company that is required at the manufacturer and if we are not in a position to say. At 4. Please tell me any reason to change the diameter standards